我国高等教育法治70年发展史
2020年1月21日
台湾地区领导人选举结果揭晓
2020年1月22日

摘要:高等教育学的学科地位虽已获得合法性与合理性,但依然面临诸多质疑,同样也面临着学科转型的学科演进趋势。这些问题源于我国高等教育学学科建设所依赖的传统三维路径:理论体系、学科建制及认知共识。但是,高等教育学学科具有特殊性,其研究对象“高等教育”处于不断变化之中,高等教育的意义、体系及内部结构改变,在不同阶段形成新的“高等教育”形态。鉴于研究对象的多变性,高等教育学科需要在有选择的继承传统学科范式的基础上,探索学科生成的现代模式。这种模式需要明确应用型目标服务高等教育发展,确立顺应知识发展与管理主义两个基本原则,以不确定性理论构建高等教育学的大学科范式。The attribute of higher education discipline has been identified by the researchers.However the status of higher education discipline is questioned because of the affection from the field theory abroad,the conflict of the methodology and the excessive differentiation of the discipline.All of the challenges are rooted on the traditional path of theory system,discipline mechanism and cognitive consensus.But higher education discipline is different from others because of the changing research object.The new“higher education”reform is different from those on other stages with the changing of the meaning and system in higher education,and its inner structure.Because of the changing character,it is necessary to find a new mode to construct higher education discipline,besides the traditional path.The new mode should suspend dispute of first level discipline or second level discipline,instead,it should identify its applied types to improve the development of higher education,follow with two principles of knowledge and management,and construct the big discipline base on the theory of uncertainty.

作者:李小娃Li Xiaowa(Guangzhou Institute of Educational Research,Guangdong Guangzhou 510055)

机构地区:广东市教育研究院

出处:《山东高等教育》2019年第4期15-24,共10页Review of Higher Education

关键词:高等教育学学科领域范式不确定性higher educationdisciplinefieldparadigmuncertainty

分类号:G640[文化科学—高等教育学]

作者:简介李小娃(1983—),男,山东东营人,教育学博士,广州市教育研究院助理研究员。

你也许喜欢的教育学论文

教育学相关文章